I suspect the CFB Playoff Committee will have Clemson, Alabama, Oklahoma, and Iowa in some order in their "big four" on Tuesday night with Michigan State (conveniently) slotted #5. Yes, it will just so happen that Iowa and MSU will be #4 and #5...oh the magic of math. Well, that mathematical slight of hand / book cooking aside, My Numbers agree on three of those four this week, putting Oklahoma in the pole position interestingly enough, and they likewise agree that the 4th entry should come from the Big Ten. But we probably don't agree on which Big 10 team. The committee is going to give us Iowa. But I believe Ohio State's full season body of work is better than either Iowa's or Michigan State's.
Oh the outrage!!!! But, but, but,... Yeah, I know. MSU beat Ohio State. And if I was running My Numbers on that particular, one-game MSU-OSU season, Michigan State would be "in" before Ohio State without question. But what I'm interested in here is the overall W/L percentage of teams, their overall strength of schedule, and how they played...overall. In my humble opinion, that is a better way of coming up with the best four teams at any particular moment in time.
Controversial? Yes. Defendable by data that I'm happy to share? Also yes. Can the committee say the same thing?
And taking this one step further, I strongly suspect that Ohio State will be the 4th team invited to the 2015-16 CFB Playoff, should Clemson or Alabama lose in their respective conference title game next weekend. Why? Recall your recent history, loyal reader. The committee was infatuated with Ohio State throughout this process, at every step and well before the Buckeyes sent a clear and emphatic, ass-stomping message to everyone from an undisclosed Ann Arbor post office last weekend. And recall your CFB history, specifically those times where "head-to-head" results ended up meaning a lot less in deciding national championships than many (most?) expected:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_Florida_State_vs._Notre_Dame_football_game
"But we have a playoff now. We have a committee. That will never happen again!"
Not so fast my friend...
| team | W | L | SOS | OEFF | DEFF | MN Rating | |
| 1 | Oklahoma | 11 | 1 | 20 | 9 | 11 | 8.2 |
| 2 | Alabama | 11 | 1 | 5 | 53 | 2 | 11.5 |
| 3 | Clemson | 12 | 0 | 47 | 22 | 10 | 13.7 |
| 4 | Ohio State | 11 | 1 | 61 | 27 | 5 | 17.0 |
| 5 | TCU | 10 | 2 | 36 | 11 | 37 | 18.5 |
| 6 | North Carolina | 11 | 1 | 63 | 2 | 40 | 19.0 |
| 7 | Notre Dame | 10 | 2 | 19 | 5 | 64 | 19.2 |
| Florida State | 10 | 2 | 57 | 19 | 12 | 19.2 | |
| 9 | Ole Miss | 9 | 3 | 22 | 8 | 23 | 19.8 |
| 10 | Iowa | 12 | 0 | 62 | 43 | 18 | 21.0 |
| 11 | Baylor | 9 | 2 | 58 | 1 | 32 | 24.2 |
| 12 | Oklahoma State | 10 | 2 | 37 | 20 | 62 | 24.3 |
| 13 | Stanford | 10 | 2 | 16 | 21 | 85 | 24.8 |
| 14 | LSU | 8 | 3 | 8 | 24 | 39 | 28.8 |
| 15 | Georgia | 9 | 3 | 59 | 37 | 13 | 29.2 |
| 16 | Michigan State | 11 | 1 | 53 | 63 | 54 | 29.8 |
| 17 | Florida | 10 | 2 | 46 | 100 | 7 | 30.0 |
| 18 | Michigan | 9 | 3 | 42 | 72 | 6 | 31.0 |
| 19 | Houston | 11 | 1 | 94 | 28 | 57 | 31.3 |
| 20 | Oregon | 9 | 3 | 25 | 4 | 100 | 32.5 |
| 21 | Northwestern | 10 | 2 | 44 | 120 | 8 | 33.2 |
| BYU | 9 | 3 | 67 | 36 | 30 | 33.2 | |
| 23 | Western Kentucky | 10 | 2 | 107 | 3 | 63 | 33.3 |
| 24 | UCLA | 8 | 4 | 33 | 34 | 25 | 33.8 |
| 25 | Appalachian State | 9 | 2 | 126 | 13 | 16 | 34.8 |